|

Ever wonder why fast food ads look so different from the food you get from the drive thru? You’re not the only one feeling deceived. In fact, some consumers may actually be eligible for reimbursement.

In this episode of Cut to the Chase: Podcast, host Gregg Goldfarb is joined by attorney Anthony Russo to expose how fast food giants may be misleading consumers through deceptive advertising.

From burgers that appear up to 35% larger in ads to questionable ingredient and labeling claims, Russo breaks down the class action lawsuits targeting companies like Burger King, Arby’s, Hardee’s, and even major candy brands.

This conversation exposes the most popular food styling tactics, the legal “eye test,” and consumer protection laws that are holding corporations accountable. Whether you’re curious about class actions, false advertising, or your rights as a consumer, this episode will give you a behind-the-scenes look at some of the most high-profile lawsuits in fast food history.

What to expect in this episode:

  • Details on class action lawsuits against Burger King, Arby’s, Hardee’s, and others
  • The “eye test” standard courts use to evaluate misleading advertising
  • How food styling can become deceptive
  • What class certification means and how consumers could be compensated
  • Why most false advertising cases never make it to court
  • How fast food lawsuits are reshaping consumer protection law
  • How false advertising lawsuits could change the way food is sold in America
  • Russo’s work beyond fast food, including major mass tort cases like Suboxone litigation

 

Stay tuned for more updates, and don’t miss our next deep dive on Cut to the Chase: Podcast with Gregg Goldfarb!

 

Subscribe, rate, review, and share this episode of the Cut to the Chase: Podcast!

 

Resources:

 

This episode was produced and brought to you by Reignite Media.